Section 1: Design | |||||
Description | Consumer Design
(0) |
Not 16/7, Seems solid
(1) |
16/7 Commercial or 24/7 Limited I/O
(5) |
24/7 Commercial AND full set of IO inc. GPIO
(10) |
Comments |
1. Sustainability & GPIO | X | Feels very cheap; has serial, ethernet | |||
Total | 1 |
Section 2: Graphics | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. HD Test | X | Significant banding | |||
2. UHD Test | X | Significant banding | |||
Total | 6 |
Section 3: Basic Video Quality | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. 640/60i (SD) | X | ||||
2. 1080/60p (HD) | X | ||||
3. 1080/60i (HD) Natural image | X | ||||
4. Multi pictures in zone a or b | X | Good dual video decoding; missing ticker | |||
Total | 18 |
Section 4: Advanced Video Quality | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. 2160/60i H.264 | X | ||||
2. 2160/60p H.265 | X | Very bizarre flickering | |||
3. (UHD) Natural image H.265 | X | ||||
4. High bit rate natural "driving" | X | ||||
5. Basic HLS | X | ||||
6. Adv HLS | X | ||||
Total | 21 |
Section 5: HTML Performance (hover over test descriptions to view score criteria) |
|||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Low Score
(1) |
Medium Score
(3) |
High Score
(5) |
Comments |
1. WebGL
WebGL Score breakdown |
X | Would't load | |||
2. Responsiveness
Responsiveness Score breakdown |
X | Would't load | |||
3. Octane
Octane Score breakdown |
X | Score: 2378 | |||
4. Motion Mark
Motion Mark Score breakdown |
X | Would't load | |||
5. Complex Javascript
Complex Javascript Score breakdown |
X | ||||
6. General HTML5
General HTML5 Score breakdown |
X | Would't load | |||
Total | 6 |
LG 32SM5KE - Score: 52
Test resolution: HD | Browser: Proprietary | CPU: ARM Cortex-A53
System Memory: 2gb:DDR3 (2133MHz) + DDR4 (2666MHz)
Pros:Video performance rather good, scales UHD to HD no problem. UI is very cloud-based signage oriented.. Can't select inputs easily
Cons:Cheap feeling display, limited I/O. Bizzare HTML testing results, wouldn't load most tests, but did load others…
Summary: Rather expensive 32" display with hit and mostly miss HTML performance.