Section 1: Design | |||||
Description | Consumer Design
(0) |
Not 16/7, Seems solid
(1) |
16/7 Commercial or 24/7 Limited I/O
(5) |
24/7 Commercial AND full set of IO inc. GPIO
(10) |
Comments |
1. Sustainability & GPIO | X | Module with limited I/O. Gets very hot. | |||
Total | 0 |
Section 2: Graphics | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. HD Test | X | Extreme aliasing | |||
2. UHD Test | X | Extreme aliasing | |||
Total | 2 |
Section 3: Basic Video Quality | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. 640/60i (SD) | X | Scaling wrong and jaggy | |||
2. 1080/60p (HD) | X | Jerky unviewable playback | |||
3. 1080/60i (HD) Natural image | X | Jerky and jaggy unviewable playback | |||
4. Multi pictures in zone a or b | X | Plays but not viewable; video barely moves | |||
Total | 4 |
Section 4: Advanced Video Quality | |||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Many Artifacts
(1) |
One or 2 Artefacts
(3) |
No Artefacts
(5) |
Comments |
1. 2160/60i H.264 | X | Image appears, static but not scaled | |||
2. 2160/60p H.265 | X | No H.265 | |||
3. (UHD) Natural image H.265 | X | No H.265 | |||
4. High bit rate natural "driving" | X | No H.265 | |||
5. Basic HLS | X | Not supported | |||
6. Adv HLS | X | Not supported | |||
Total | 1 |
Section 5: HTML Performance (hover over test descriptions to view score criteria) |
|||||
Description | No Picture
(0) |
Low Score
(1) |
Medium Score
(3) |
High Score
(5) |
Comments |
1. WebGL
WebGL Score breakdown |
X | No picture, doesn't support WebGL | |||
2. Responsiveness
Responsiveness Score breakdown |
X | Score: 5.71 | |||
3. Octane
Octane Score breakdown |
X | Score: 2570 | |||
4. Motion Mark
Motion Mark Score breakdown |
X | 2.44 | |||
5. Complex Javascript
Complex Javascript Score breakdown |
X | Fine | |||
6. General HTML5
General HTML5 Score breakdown |
X | Score: 487 | |||
Total | 11 |
Raspi 3B - Score: 18
Test resolution: HD | Browser: Chrome 51
Pros: HTML per was poor, but could surprisingly handle some complex HTML sites rather well. You could get lucky.
Cons:Really bad overal performance, no H.265, does scale, but poor image quality. Can't really handle motion video
Summary: